h1

The “Laissez-Faire Racism” of Libertarianism (Blacks Wouldn’t Vote For Paul Anyway)

January 2, 2012

I like the idea of laissez-faire capitalism espoused by libertarians. The problem is that it can never be actualized in the real world. Once you combine any theory with human nature you end up with severe deficiencies that make it nothing like the original. The liberty part of that name either doesn’t apply to people or color or it applies to them to a lesser extent than whites. It’s analogous to telling a secret to a kid at one end of a line of kids and having it emerge from the other end as complete and utter nonsense. It’s truth in and lies out. Many whites are in love with Ron Paul now because he is the most recent lesser of how ever many evils there are now. I’ve lost count. He looks far better than anything out there because Americans believe he hasn’t been co-opted and isn’t lying to us like ALL of them have done before him. How many times will we believe their lies? I guess we’ll find out once the no longer need to lie to us and can just boldly tell us we’re slaves without brainwashing propaganda.

Obama did actually turn out to be worse than Bush, if that is even possible, but only now do whites feel comfortable saying so since other whites have already breached that racial impasse of political correctness because of the depression (and it is a depression, not a recession). The fact that Americans fell for Obama’s lies tells you that they can and will for for Paul’s as well. Maybe that’s what Obama meant by “Yes we can”. Yes we can fool the idiotic masses time and time again. Americans worship money and money only. We depend on this phony system because we no longer know how to live off the land. As long as Paul takes care of white people’s money there is no amount of suffering they are not willing to heap onto the overloaded shoulders of black Americans or anyone who stands in the way of this materialist, non-spiritual view of reality.

Ron Paul is under fire of late for some seemingly racist newsletters a few years ago. I used to like Ron Paul at first when I still believed that good people could be elected by a system corrupt to the core. I know realize that our votes don’t matter. All of the candidates are pre-selected by the elite. It doesn’t matter what they say. It only matters what they do. Anyone who attempts to contravene the interests of the elite will be ruined or killed or both. Now when I look at Ron Paul I don’t like what I see and not because of some stupid newsletters he should have canned. I don’t trust his beady little eyes.  I’ve never seen anyone with beady eyes like that who wasn’t racist.  Most libertarians are racists by exclusion of all non-white races just like the Republicans. They just hide it behind their free market bullshit.

Here’s just a few of Ron Paul’s racist newsletters:

A Special Issue on Racial Terrorism” analyzes the Los Angeles riots of 1992: “Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began. … What if the checks had never arrived? No doubt the blacks would have fully privatized the welfare state through continued looting. But they were paid off and the violence subsided.”

The November 1990 issue of the Political Report had kind words for David Duke.

This December 1990 newsletter describes Martin Luther King Jr. as “a world-class adulterer” who “seduced underage girls and boys” and “replaced the evil of forced segregation with the evil of forced integration.”

February 1991 newsletter attacks “The X-Rated Martin Luther King.”

An October 1990 edition of the Political Report ridicules black activists, led by Al Sharpton, for demonstrating at the Statue of Liberty in favor of renaming New York City after Martin Luther King. The newsletter suggests that  “Welfaria,”  “Zooville,” “Rapetown,” “Dirtburg,”and “Lazyopolis ” would be better alternatives—and says,  “Next time, hold that demonstration at a food stamp bureau or a crack house.”

A May 1990 issue of the Ron Paul Political Report cites Jared Taylor, who six months later would go onto found the eugenicist and white supremacist periodical American Renaissance.

The January 1993 issue of the Survival Report worries about America’s “disappearing white majority.”

The July 1992 Ron Paul Political Report declares, “Jury verdicts, basketball games, and even music are enough to set off black rage, it seems,” and defends David Duke. The author of the newsletter—presumably Paul—writes, “My youngest son is starting his fourth year in medical school. He tells me there would be no way to persuade his fellow students of the case for economic liberty.”

A March 1993 Survival Report describes Bill Clinton’s supposedly “illegitimate children, black and white: ‘woods colts’ in backwoods slang.”

In general I do not find these newsletters particularly offensive. If Ron Paul hates the Jewish elite or even Jews in general I actually applaud that because they deserve it but whites in general do not care about racism against non-whites. They may feel a little guilt or angry when we complain about it but there is usually insufficient moral turpitude to take action to remedy injustice. The elite hate ALL of us but we spend our time hating each other over race, religion, guns, abortion and the like. They sit back and marvel at how easily they are able to divide and conquer the masses. They probably regret putting so much time and effort into the whole scheme because we would have fallen for with far less effort on their part. Americans worry about themselves and themselves only these days. The only unity around anything is the singular paper chase to acquire more Jewish debt notes so people can buy solid dead objects they find temporarily pleasing in the absence of any cognizance of a soul attached to their being.

Is Ron Paul a racist? He seems to be because he knew what those newsletters said before he released them. Does it matter? Not in the long run. He won’t get elected either way but at least now the Jewish media, the biggest racists of all, can say it happened because people of color refused to support him, as if we really have a say in anything. Given no other choice I would support Paul because it’s better to deal with jobs staying in America along with institutional racism than with jobs outsourced or otherwise sold to the lowest bidder. Fewer jobs means people will do anything to get one and keep one. That’s a bad deal for blacks who usually don’t have as many fruitful social connections as whites. It’s always a lesser of two evils choice for blacks. You have to remember Jews hate everyone but they hate a special reservoir of hate in their empty hearts for blacks or what they call “schvartze”, their Yiddish word for nigger.

Talk about equality is fine for whites when the economy is booming so to speak (meaning the elite are making out like the bandits they are) but as soon as shit hits the fan blacks always end up revisiting the proverbial economic “Jim Crow” of America, locked out by  whites locking themselves in. Institutional racism has always been about “golf course,” backdoor, “boys club” deals that blacks are never privy to. It’s exclusion by avoiding inclusion so it doesn’t appear to be racist or immoral to the average white person who would never admit it that it was anyway. The original crime was Jews having blacks brought to America in the first place to replace the white slave population. It’s just much easier to practice racism when all the slaves are members of the same race. It’s all money worship folks. The Jews own us and YOU! Soon they won’t need us and they will start doing what parasites do best……finishing off their hosts before moving on to another. I actually applaud Ron Paul for the positions he claims to espouse but he it will take more than a free market to cure what ails this country. I have no reason at all to believe he is either not a plant or, if not, that he would be able to actually implement any of his anti-corruption platform. Like I said if he’s the real deal the elite will kill him and his son Rand.

You are not allowed to do what is right for Americans and live to talk about it unless they can minimize the damage you cause like they did with former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney. Americans, especially whites, refuse to acknowledge this fact that any seemingly viable candidate that is allowed to go far has already been bought or blackmailed by the elite. The system perpetuates itself by excluding those not willing to do its bidding. Paul is no exception. He is most likely  just a tool to keep the flimsy hopes of progressives and independents alive.  There is no way to reform a system of 100% blackmail, bribery and kickbacks. JFK found out the hard way.

You don’t do the right thing (although he was far from perfect as am I) and expect to have a lengthy political career. They usually don’t even allow good people in the front door at all by sabotaging them early in their careers at the local and state level. The Jewish elite will ALWAYS stand in the way of reform because their monetary system must remain in place to continue your enslavement. You cannot somehow sneak in as an underdog and then steal the nomination or election at the last minute. Clearly white Americans are just desperate for change and clinging to any minute hope of it but look in the mirror. How many of us wouldn’t do what the elite commanded if they promised us a huge sum of money and a cozy retirement in some tropical paradise? We worship money folks. Not every single one of but 99% of us and that’s plenty to keep us right where we are……….nowhere. This system must be destroyed not reformed.

Let me be perfectly clear. Ron Paul and his son will be murdered (and the whole incident covered up) if they are the real deal and pose any real threat to the continuance of this technological slave system. That’s your government America. Enjoy the fruits of our collective lack of vigilance in protecting your imaginary rights. Guess they weren’t so inalienable after all huh? 2012 is going to literally bring us to our knees. We will beg for mercy.

%d bloggers like this: