Archive for February, 2008

h1

Tactical Voting – Why I’m Supporting John McCain

February 29, 2008

You’re probably thinking “What!?!?!” right now. Yes. You heard it right. I’m supporting John McCain, the racist, war-mongering, flip-flopping Vietnam war veteran that drafted and eventually passed meaningless campaign finance reform. Make no mistake, I loathe John McCain. I loathe Republicans, neocons and conservatives but until Democrats stop practicing least-worst voting whereby we throw our full support behind corporate candidates that will not and cannot bring change to this country, I would prefer Republicans be in charge and continue the rapid slide into oblivion that we are currently experiencing. This will accelerate the suffering of the people, an unfortunate side-effect, but also is more likely to awaken more people to the fact that they are tacitly approving of their own fleecing by voting for candidates like Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. It will also give people less to lose, possibly producing enough angst to cause people to get off their duffs and do something besides casting a meaningless vote every four years.

My vote is purely symbolic and tactical of course. I actually supported Kucinich but since he’s out I now support Nader or whoever the Greens nominate but just because I support their policies doesn’t mean they will get my vote because I want real change and sometimes real change means embracing your enemies. What liberals, quasi-progressives and Democrats don’t understand is that, yes, the Democrats in some ways are a better deal than the Republicans but in some ways they are also worse. The Democrats are much better at presenting a palatable veneer to their corruption than the Republicans, and certainly the neocons, but ultimately their goal is the same: perpetual war for the military industrial complex and spreading our current unsustainable way of life to every corner and pocket of this one and only inhabitable planet of ours. Both parties are out to destroy the human species and I don’t want that to happen. No human should.

Vote McCain in 2008!!!! Accelerate the downfall of the empire and the awakening of the comatose, brainwashed American public. It may actually save the human race.

h1

Defining “Thickness”

February 22, 2008

I am always disgusted when I talk to a female on the phone or over the internet before meeting them in person and they describe themselves as “thick” when in fact they are obese. “Thick” is a black term that means pronounced ass, thighs and breasts but also means curves and hips. Women, particularly white women, have perverted the term to include anything that is large because they think black men will take anything with white skin. It’s a form of racism. If you’re fat it goes without saying that you will have large breasts. You will have a large everything. That is not “thick”. Thick means you have a figure that was genetically conferred on you, not by eating and/or not exercising.

White woman are raised to believe that all black men desire them. They are raised to believe that black men have an uncontrollable sex drive and that we all have huge twelve inch penises. Some of us do but that is by far the exception to the rule. Regardless of how we are built or sexually driven black men like “thick” women and many black women are built that way. There are many Latinas that fit the bill as well. You rarely see a white woman with a “thick” body but if you do they almost always date black men only and they almost always sleep around like they are trying to experience as much blackness as possible. Most white guys don’t really go for the thickness because they’ve been conditioned to appreciate thinness. Whatever the case may be it’s time for all women to stop abusing the term “thick”, but especially white women. Just because you can’t find a white man or anyone else doesn’t mean black men want you. “Thick” is attractive. Fat is not. If black men have sex with fat white women then either he has a big girl fetish or he just wants to do nasty things that many non-fat women refuse to do in the bedroom.

I understand the social dynamic when it comes to overweight white women. Some black men lower their physical standards because they consider whiteness to be desirable. For the record that is mental slavery and needs to stop. For overweight white women they are rejected by their white men and turn to black men when their self-esteem has been damaged. That is adding insult to injury in my opinion. Why don’t they turn to Asian men or Arab men instead? But as we all know blacks are on the socioeconomic bottom of this country and world. Whites know this and subconsciously direct their behavior accordingly.

What goes unsaid is that very few men actually find overweight women attractive. Overweight white women, and most overweight women in general, are easy though. They will have sex with almost anyone that they believe is out of their league and on the first night. Not only will they have sex they will go way beyond that too. I mean threesomes, trains, anal, double penetrations, a2m, facials, swallowing and the like. Fat women are freaks. They have to be because it’s the only way they can keep a man around. It’s too bad the man is not staying around out of respect. We’re just using those for something we can do any sick thing we can think of to without the woman complaining about it. That control is a turn-on for some men but most men can never get past the fatness to reach the freaky part. We spend our time trying to get attractive women to do the freaky things and usually with little success in America. Overseas is quite a different story. Makes me wonder why I haven’t left already.

h1

Valentine’s Day: Corporate Prostitution

February 11, 2008

The world’s oldest profession makes it yearly corporate appearance this Thursday. Valentine’s Day has become as commercial as the rest of our corporate holidays. Kids these days don’t even know the history behind any of US holidays. There is something creepy though about how Valentine’s Day is pimped to society. The commercials show women in all their orgasmic glee receiving diamonds and gold from a guy expecting a sexual payback. Candy and flowers isn’t even acceptable anymore. Guys are being told to buy things they have to finance, even husbands who are probably already still paying off a ring from their engagement and subsequent marriage.

When people ask me what’s wrong with America I tell them corporations. They take all the meaning out of everything in pursuit of the almighty dollar. Sex is sold. Women are sold. Love is sold. Our very souls are sold. Whatever else is wrong with this nation, and there is plenty, this is the symptomatic of it all. And women don’t help my getting all depressed and pouting when you don’t get anything other than an “I love you”. I can remember in my lifetime when that was enough. Those days are over, probably never to return before the next Ice Age. Damn that’s cold.

h1

The Meaninglessness of Slavery Apologies

February 10, 2008

Apologizing for things is such an American phenomenon. Every time someone says something racist or sexist or otherwise vile on tv or radio the Sharptons and Jacksons of our day immediately come to the rescue. Usually it’s their own rescue. Think about it. Why do people say vile things? Answer: Because they had the thought and for a second thought they could get away with being more honest than is allowed on tv or radio. My point is that people say exactly what they mean when they offend people so any subsequent apology is meaningless. What people are sorry about is not what they said or how it affected the victim but how if affected them. No one wants to be viewed as a racist or sexist because that hits you in the pocket. I like what Malcolm X said on the topic. He preferred a overt racist to a white liberal, which he considered wolves in sheep’s clothing. He’s right. If you want to call me a “nigger” then call me a “nigger”. Of course you are going to take an ass-whoopin’ right after if slips from your tongue but political correctness has made this country a bunch of angry, suppressed cowards.

The first amendment has been eviscerated for all practical purposes because there are rules for speech on the public airwaves. That is the main avenue of communication and it’s censored beyond belief in this country. What does this all have to do with whites apologizing for slavery? Whites are not sorry about slavery. I don’t want them to be. What I want is for them to acknowledge that they are still benefiting from centuries of unequal treatment and continuing to widen the gap at non-whites’ expense. Whites know it’s true. They just don’t care. Instead of helping others catch up socioeconomically, whites prefer to maintain their relative advantage at the expense of the entire common good afforded by equality for all. Whites are really shooting themselves and everyone else in the foot but the impact of racism on white people in rarely discussed in this country or anywhere else.

If whites are not sorry for slavery then why apologize? Because they believe it absolves them of financial reparations. Plain and simple. They think if they talk the talk they don’t have to walk the walk. They’re probably right but empty apologies only add fuel to the reparations fire. It would be better if whites did absolutely nothing than add another atrocity to the legacy of slavery with empty rhetoric. Black people just have to work harder than whites to get ahead. It’s that simple. We are at a severe disadvantage and it’s not going to change with a violent revolution of some sort. I know it sucks.

What really burns me though is that apologies are supposed to demonstrate a change in mindset and behavior. After whites apologize for slavery they continue their oppression and subjugation of blacks just as they did before? It’s like shooting someone, apologizing for it and then shooting them again. Whites apparently do not understand what an apology means. It does not give license to continued mistreatment. There is supposed to be a genuine change of heart. This is a whole other issue with most white people. I honestly do not believe they can change. I honestly do not believe they are capable collectively of empathy. I think the entire western world is based on competition, accumulation of assets and backstabbing. The “white way”, as I refer to it, is what is tearing the fabric of society, and what are normally emotive human beings, apart.

It is up to other races to instruct whites on the real meaning of life. The only problem is since whites think they are always right via white supremacy, they will scarcely listen to the opinings of anyone with darker skin. It’s a conundrum and one that has not even been addressed in the public sphere. What is driving white people to this behavior? Obviously there is a evolutionary aspect to this that has not been addressed sufficiently. Bobby Wright called it a psychopathic racial personality. Blacks are blamed for always bringing up race but in reality it is whites that cannot put it aside. It is a problem with currently no solution and our time is running out.

h1

Why Creationism cannot include Evolution

February 2, 2008

People that are tired of having the argument of creationism or intelligent design versus evolution keep repeating their mantra. Why can the two not coexist? Why couldn’t God have created the universe and then set it into motion using evolution?

First of all why do that? Did God not know what was going to happen? Did he have some other things to do wanted to do and needed a few hundred million years to get them done before we get here? Evolution is a nonstop process. Religious people pretend that humanity is the end of it. It continues even as we speak. Why would God want its own creation to be in continuous metamorphosis?

The most powerful argument against dual creationism-evolution is Christianity itself. The Bible says God created everything in six days. It makes no mention of evolution. If everything already existed then why are new things being created through evolution? The answer is clear. Everything cannot possibly in an instant and at the same time because the world isn’t big enough for it. The Bible was written by people with no scientific knowledge whatsoever and it is demonstrated perfectly in every book of the Bible.

Evolutionary inclusionists will say that God created everything, including evolution, that was necessary to produce anything. That of course includes humans and the wide variety of life we find currently on the planet. Bullshit. Making this stuff up as you go is not permitted. If God wanted us to know his plan for mankind it would not have been so nebulous in its explanation or it would have provided an updated version of the Bible to humans today. God hasn’t updated his word in thousands of years. Why?

Christians will say it’s because of faith. God wants us to trust it no matter what and we shouldn’t questions it plan or its mysterious ways. Once again: Bullshit. If God gave us brains then why are we not supposed to use them? If God created evolution then the brain is a product of that. That would mean God is not perfect, another gotcha for the Christians. Christians will always fall back on their faith because it is all they have. Their arguments are completely debunked and disproven. If there is a God, which I doubt, it obviously doesn’t give a shit what we do and it sure as hell is not described by the feeble attempts on man-made religion.